完成论文初稿后，通常需要寻求专家评审以获取专业的反馈和建议。然而，即便是对于经验丰富的教师来说，这也是一项颇具挑战性的任务。
同学们，幸运的是，我们生活在有AI的世界，可以借助ChatGPT这样的人工智能工具来模拟专家评审的过程。
通过分批次将论文内容输入给ChatGPT，或者利用AskYourPDF这样的第三方插件直接上传论文，我们可以要求ChatGPT对论文进行细致的评审，并提供针对性的修改建议。在输入论文内容后，我们需要明确指示ChatGPT进行评审。
这篇文章会教大家
ChatGPT评审润色论文的指令有哪些？
5分钟3万字，免费3级大纲（两千字），附带ppt，开题报告，40篇真实参考文献，查重超过10%退费！
https://www.aipaperpass.com?pic=mLnwhttps://www.aipaperpass.com?pic=mLnw
评价论文的逻辑性和连贯性：
中文指令：
请你作为顶级期刊评审专家，请分析文本逻辑与连贯性，并提供改善流畅性和段落联系的建议。同时，给出句子修改意见，以提升整体质量和可读性。但无需提供原始文本。
English Prompt：
As a top-tier journal reviewer, please analyze the logic and coherence of the text, and provide suggestions to improve its fluency and paragraph connections. Additionally, suggest sentence modifications to enhance the overall quality and readability of the text. However, there is no need to provide the original text.
评价论文结构：
中文指令：
请你作为顶级期刊评审专家，评估这篇论文的组织结构清晰度，确认其引言、方法、结果、讨论和结论是否逻辑连贯，确保读者能明确理解作者的研究目的、实施方式、主要发现及这些发现的深层意义。同时，请提供具有建设性的批评意见。
English Prompt：
As a reviewer for a top-tier journal, I will evaluate the clarity of the organizational structure of this paper. I will confirm whether its introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion are logically coherent, ensuring that readers can clearly understand the author's research objectives, implementation methods, key findings, and the underlying implications of these findings. Additionally, I will provide constructive criticism to help improve the paper's overall quality and readability.
研究方法是否适当：
中文指令：
你作为顶级期刊的评审专家，请分析此论文的研究设计科学性及合理性，核实所采用的方法和实验设计与研究问题的契合度，并评估样本量的充足性。同时，请提出具有批判性的改进建议。
English Prompt：
As a reviewer for a top-tier journal, I will analyze the scientificity and rationality of the research design in this paper. I will verify the appropriateness of the methods and experimental design in relation to the research question. Additionally, I will assess the sufficiency of the sample size used. Finally, I will provide critical suggestions for improvement to enhance the overall quality of the paper.
讨论是否适当：
中文指令：
请你作为顶级期刊的评审专家，对这篇文章的讨论部分就下面几个问题进行评审：
1.讨论是否与实验结果相符？2.讨论内容是否基于实验结果，没有超出其支持范围？3.是否包含未证实的假设或推测？4.有哪些观点缺乏充分论据？5.是否深入解释了实验结果？6.与现有研究有何联系？7.与其他研究相比，结果有何异同？请提供对讨论部分的批判性意见。
English Prompt：
As a reviewer for a top-tier journal, I will evaluate the discussion section of this article based on the following criteria:
1.Does the discussion align with the experimental results?
2.Is the discussion content grounded in the experimental results, without exceeding their scope of support?
3.Does the discussion contain unconfirmed assumptions or speculative claims?
4.Are there any viewpoints lacking sufficient evidence or argumentation?
5.Does the discussion provide a thorough interpretation of the experimental results?
6.How does the discussion connect with existing research?
7.How do the results of this study differ or align with those of other studies?
Please provide critical feedback on the discussion section based on these questions.
核对结果数据：
中文指令：
请将结果部分中报告的数据与表格中的数据进行对比，并针对结果部分中可能存在的偏差进行修正。在对比过程中，如果发现有不一致或不合理的地方，请提出建设性的批评意见。
English Prompt：
Compare the data reported in the Results section with those presented in the tables, and make corrections to any deviations found in the Results section. If there are any inconsistencies or unreasonable aspects, please provide constructive criticism.
从发表角度评判整篇论文：
中文指令：
请你作为顶级期刊的评审专家，依据发表标准评估此篇文章，并提出具体的修改建议。
English Prompt：
As a reviewer for a top-tier journal, please evaluate this article based on the publication standards and provide specific suggestions for improvement.